National Online League - Added Value Clarification

[Sef]

dont think it will affect Div 2 anyway , as Dublin players at top of individual , and closest Glasgow is too far behind anyway for top spot

Yeah mate.... i"ll just take my seat from the team points

[gerry5421]

Division 2

The top three players of the winning team in each division, along with the Divisional Player of The Season will be allocated an entry into the APAT European Amateur Championship to be held in Prague. (Seat and contribution to travel expenses, total package worth £250)

must be something else equivalnt now ??

ahhh , ok was looking at rules rather than discussion .. . and yea something different I would assume , maybe a choice of season 6 or Brighton maybe

[gerry5421]

dont think it will affect Div 2 anyway , as Dublin players at top of individual , and closest Glasgow is too far behind anyway for top spot

Yeah mate.... i"ll just take my seat from the team points

Better get defending hard on last game then ,lol stiff competition

[BOINGBLITZ]

The rules are there Steve and whether we like em or not, we have to abide by them.
Whatever was said in a discussion about the value of the seats, I can"t see anything in the rules that says an actual value, hence my original question.
 If it states somewhere that it is a UKIPT seat, then that surely has to be honoured (£770 value now I believe?)
 If it states that it is a £550 seat, then that surely has to be honoured.....I just can"t find ANYTHING stated anywhere, but hopefully Rich can clarify the situation soon.

[BOINGBLITZ]

Hmmm.....could be interesting then as a seat only is now worth £700.

[TightEnd]

Hmmm.....could be interesting then as a seat only is now worth £700.

Not interesting at all really...we"d find an equivalent value to the £550

current APAT added value is 888 Superstack seats, not UKIPTs, for example

I have asked Des to take a look and clarify

[AMRN]

Hmmm.....could be interesting then as a seat only is now worth £700.

Not interesting at all really...we"d find an equivalent value to the £550

current APAT added value is 888 Superstack seats, not UKIPTs, for example

I have asked Des to take a look and clarify

Genting Poker Series for £430....

[Des]

Hmmm.....could be interesting then as a seat only is now worth £700.

Not interesting at all really...we"d find an equivalent value to the £550

current APAT added value is 888 Superstack seats, not UKIPTs, for example

I have asked Des to take a look and clarify

Agreed, we"d look to do the Genting Poker seats, albeit at the slightly lower value.  For the Div 2 prizes, we"d look to switch to a WCOAP passport to the value of £200 to £250, tbc when we finalise the WCOAP 2012 schedule.  

[Sef]

Hmmm.....could be interesting then as a seat only is now worth £700.

Not interesting at all really...we"d find an equivalent value to the £550

current APAT added value is 888 Superstack seats, not UKIPTs, for example

I have asked Des to take a look and clarify

Agreed, we"d look to do the Genting Poker seats, albeit at the slightly lower value.  For the Div 2 prizes, we"d look to switch to a WCOAP passport to the value of £200 to £250, tbc when we finalise the WCOAP 2012 schedule. 

Oh  that means if i win one i gotta learn the games. better get cracking. lol

[AMRN]

For the Div 2 prizes, we"d look to switch to a WCOAP passport to the value of £200 to £250, tbc when we finalise the WCOAP 2012 schedule. 

that"s an excellent idea, and would be really attractive value add for future tourneys (in my opinion)

[Des]

For the Div 2 prizes, we"d look to switch to a WCOAP passport to the value of £200 to £250, tbc when we finalise the WCOAP 2012 schedule. 

that"s an excellent idea, and would be really attractive value add for future tourneys (in my opinion)

We agree.

[BOINGBLITZ]

I totally disagree.

"The top three players of the winning team in each division, along with the Divisional Player of The Season will be allocated an entry into a UKIPT Main Event. (Seat only, worth £500)"

So which is it....a UKIPT Main Event seat or a £500 seat?

It has to be one or the other or the rules are being changed after the fact surely?

[BOINGBLITZ]

If you are going to give out £430 seats then I assume you will also be giving each player £120 cash?

[Pears27]

Or expanding it to 4 from the winning team to use up the newly saved 3x£120 (plus a wee bit)...?

[BOINGBLITZ]

Earlier on I replied to Scouse"s idea by stating that "Rules are rules" because you can"t go changing them because you don"t like who wins.
 The same applies here...whether you like Paul"s or Scouse"s ideas is irrelevant...the prizes and who wins them are quite clear and should not be changed now the League is almost over.