Author Topic: QQ in BB  (Read 10426 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

TheSnapper

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1061
Re: QQ in BB
« Reply #15 on: March 19, 2012, 13:35:21 PM »

Thanks Brendan was hoping you"d post something like that.. presuming this is heads up? What about a 3-way pot?

Be interesting to see Dave"s read and how it played out anyway.. I"ve still got a bad feeling x


Even 3 way we still need to bet the flop for value.

Sometimes you get it in bad but it was still the right thing to do. Even maniac fish flop sets sometimes.
"Being wrong is erroneously associated with failure, when, in fact, to be proven wrong should be celebrated, for it elevates someone to a new level of understanding."

PHIL_TC

  • Administrator
  • Platinum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1908
Re: QQ in BB
« Reply #16 on: March 19, 2012, 13:38:16 PM »

By nature, I don"t think this would be posted if David had bet the flop and all folded.


I play poker most weeks with Dave... this might be a cunningly disguised blatent "I bet on the flop and they all folded" brag.. but I suspect not  ;D


Even 3 way we still need to bet the flop for value.


So if we"re typically 62% fav against 1 player, how are we fairing against 2 players?... got to be close?
Winner of 1 gold, 2 silver & 1 bronze medals.
Proud member of team England '11 & '12 (Home Internationals) & team APAT  '11

Now pretty much poker retired, but available to help feed / sub the APAT server hamsters now & again.

http://pokerdb.thehendonmob.com/player.php?a=r&n=101148

AMRN

  • Staker Licensed Player
  • Platinum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5261
Re: QQ in BB
« Reply #17 on: March 19, 2012, 13:57:55 PM »

We are in bad shape versus...

44,66,77          
sets       9   combo's
76            
two pair   3   combo's

6% of that limping range.



.....and all the hh hands?

TheSnapper

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1061
Re: QQ in BB
« Reply #18 on: March 19, 2012, 13:58:58 PM »


We are in bad shape versus...

44,66,77          
sets       9   combo's
76            
two pair   3   combo's

6% of that limping range.



.....and all the hh hands? Heart Heart
"Being wrong is erroneously associated with failure, when, in fact, to be proven wrong should be celebrated, for it elevates someone to a new level of understanding."

pokerpops

  • Staker Licensed Player
  • Platinum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1225
Re: QQ in BB
« Reply #19 on: March 19, 2012, 13:59:17 PM »

By nature, I don"t think this would be posted if David had bet the flop and all folded.

Thanks Brendan, you have put what I was trying to say much more eloquently than I could. Although my excuse is that I am at work on my iPhone.


How very perceptive that first sentence is, and the post from TheSnapper (Brendan?) really sums up why we should bet for value on this flop.

I had a brainfart moment in play and mangled the whole thing. But I want a few more opinions on the whole preflop raise size and best line postflop before I confess.

Suffice to say that it did end badly as is implied in my diary post.

Just an old bloke living the dream

Proud to be an APAT Forum Team member 2013
Prouder still of being part of the Raise for Jack team, Silver medalists 2019

AMRN

  • Staker Licensed Player
  • Platinum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5261
Re: QQ in BB
« Reply #20 on: March 19, 2012, 14:00:36 PM »



We are in bad shape versus...

44,66,77          
sets       9   combo's
76            
two pair   3   combo's

6% of that limping range.



.....and all the hh hands? Heart Heart



Exactly. You said we were in bad shape vs sets and 2 pair combos - 6% of the range. Why didn"t you include heart heart hands in the range against which we are in bad shape?

TheSnapper

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1061
Re: QQ in BB
« Reply #21 on: March 19, 2012, 14:20:27 PM »



Even 3 way we still need to bet the flop for value.


So if we"re typically 62% fav against 1 player, how are we fairing against 2 players?... got to be close?



Assuming they both flat our flop bet with similar ranges for both oppo"s and including some off suit connectors in one of the two calling ranges.

Board: 6h 7h 4d

   equity          
Hand 0:    41.093%     { QQ }
Hand 1:    29.910%    { TT-22, AhJh, AhTh, Ah9h, Ah8h, Ah7h, Ah6h, Ah5h, Ah4h, Ah3h, Ah2h, KQs, KhJh, KhTh, QhJh, QhTh, JhTh, Th9h, 98s, 87s, 76s, 65s, 54s }
Hand 2:    28.997%     { TT-22, AhJh, AhTh, Ah9h, Ah8h, Ah7h, Ah6h, Ah5h, Ah4h, Ah3h, Ah2h, KQs, KhJh, KhTh, QhJh, QhTh, JhTh, Th9h, 98s, 87s, 76s, 65s, 54s, 97o+, 86o+, 75o+, 65o, 54o, 43o }

"Being wrong is erroneously associated with failure, when, in fact, to be proven wrong should be celebrated, for it elevates someone to a new level of understanding."

TheSnapper

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1061
Re: QQ in BB
« Reply #22 on: March 19, 2012, 14:30:52 PM »

Exactly. You said we were in bad shape vs sets and 2 pair combos - 6% of the range. Why didn"t you include heart heart hands in the range against which we are in bad shape?


We are ahead of flush draws so I have categorised those as hands against which we should bet for value.

"Being wrong is erroneously associated with failure, when, in fact, to be proven wrong should be celebrated, for it elevates someone to a new level of understanding."

PHIL_TC

  • Administrator
  • Platinum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1908
Re: QQ in BB
« Reply #23 on: March 19, 2012, 14:36:52 PM »

Hand 0:    41.093%     { QQ }
Hand 1:    29.910%    { TT-22, AhJh, AhTh, Ah9h, Ah8h, Ah7h, Ah6h, Ah5h, Ah4h, Ah3h, Ah2h, KQs, KhJh, KhTh, QhJh, QhTh, JhTh, Th9h, 98s, 87s, 76s, 65s, 54s }
Hand 2:    28.997%     { TT-22, AhJh, AhTh, Ah9h, Ah8h, Ah7h, Ah6h, Ah5h, Ah4h, Ah3h, Ah2h, KQs, KhJh, KhTh, QhJh, QhTh, JhTh, Th9h, 98s, 87s, 76s, 65s, 54s, 97o+, 86o+, 75o+, 65o, 54o, 43o }


Cheers Brendan, really appreciated
Winner of 1 gold, 2 silver & 1 bronze medals.
Proud member of team England '11 & '12 (Home Internationals) & team APAT  '11

Now pretty much poker retired, but available to help feed / sub the APAT server hamsters now & again.

http://pokerdb.thehendonmob.com/player.php?a=r&n=101148

George2Loose

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1668
Re: QQ in BB
« Reply #24 on: March 19, 2012, 14:38:49 PM »
Ur image?
Follow me on twitter:  gb2loose

AMRN

  • Staker Licensed Player
  • Platinum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5261
Re: QQ in BB
« Reply #25 on: March 19, 2012, 14:40:12 PM »


Exactly. You said we were in bad shape vs sets and 2 pair combos - 6% of the range. Why didn"t you include heart heart hands in the range against which we are in bad shape?


We are ahead of flush draws so I have categorised those as hands against which we should bet for value.




I"ve read the OP as saying the board is flushed - all hearts...  "764hh"

TheSnapper

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1061
Re: QQ in BB
« Reply #26 on: March 19, 2012, 15:59:53 PM »

I"ve read the OP as saying the board is flushed - all hearts...  "764hh"


You could be right but I understood it to mean 764 two of which were hearts. The suits for QQ would help too, if we hold the Qh it adds about 2% to our equity versus flush draws.
"Being wrong is erroneously associated with failure, when, in fact, to be proven wrong should be celebrated, for it elevates someone to a new level of understanding."

deanp27

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1459
Re: QQ in BB
« Reply #27 on: March 19, 2012, 16:01:41 PM »
It means 2 hearts on the flop. 3 hearts would be hhh
Looking forward to making my first day 2

Swinebag

  • Staker Licensed Player
  • Platinum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4033
Re: QQ in BB
« Reply #28 on: March 19, 2012, 17:38:39 PM »
In multilimped pots - I normally make my standard raise then add a BB for every limper in the pot, so here I open to 1500-1700. Anything less than 1500 prices in the first limper.

Brendan pretty much sums up why we bet the flop. I"m also pretty happy to play for stacks here, as most players who limp call tend to overplay a lot of hands that you beat here. Dean"s point about folding to the lady in SB is valid but I probably still get them in here
Quote from: Chipaccrual
Rob, you are a genius.
Quote from: jacklevel06
You are a genius Rob  :D

PHIL_TC

  • Administrator
  • Platinum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1908
Re: QQ in BB
« Reply #29 on: March 19, 2012, 17:52:21 PM »

I"ve read the OP as saying the board is flushed - all hearts...  "764hh"


+1

So come on then Dave.. do I need a 50p ready for Thursday night? x
Winner of 1 gold, 2 silver & 1 bronze medals.
Proud member of team England '11 & '12 (Home Internationals) & team APAT  '11

Now pretty much poker retired, but available to help feed / sub the APAT server hamsters now & again.

http://pokerdb.thehendonmob.com/player.php?a=r&n=101148