So not to derail particular staking threads, the guidelines indicate we should state the premium in terms of mark up (ie 1.1 etc) and i think this is the best way of being open about the premium being charged on the stake, whilst negating the need to state whether the return includes stake back or not. I also think it makes the 1% calculation easier that goes to APAT.
Current threads are stating in terms of 100% staking but with60/40 return etc. personally think the board should have a universal way of stating the premium (I would use decimal method).
I mean 60/40 on a 100% stake is a HUGE markup (about 1.67) and established pros would struggle to sell at that rate and I think stakers should know this before this board gets established.
Dean
This is the first time for me and APAT to ask for staking, so was not sure what to ask for. This was a kind of lets post and see what response I get. I and others will learn what is expected in terms of %/decimals and will ask for staking accordingly. You are right about the mark up but can I point out this is at half the price. You could say that I have been lucky, to get staked at that mark up, with me being first it has got a novelty factor to it. As the bigger players come along I"m sure a request like this will not get taken up.
Wayne
Wayne, I don"t normally post on these kind of things because it is easy for people to take it personally and I certainly don"t want that. The reason I made my post in the discussion thread is because this staking board is in its infancy and I was just trying to help everyone understand how staking works from my past experiences and experience of others, I wasn"t trying to single you out. I was also referring the the other staking offer that was posted that used the same method and I think it gets unnecessarily complicated.
Also I don"t get your point about the half price - just because Stars have halved the buyin doesn"t mean you are selling at a discount.
I"d be happy to stake you Wayne in most things but personally i wouldn"t stake anybody that sold at an unrealistic premium and also that didn"t have a % of their own dime at stake.
I kind of feel bad if you think I was aiming any criticism your way, it wasn"t intended like that.