Fair enough, misread the positions, my apologies. It"s never really a case of never fold but in this spot i"d have to have a very good reason to and with the information given it"s a straightforward call for me.
Given the fact we now know kuzla to be a winning player and bapsilva to be awful do you call?
yep i call
because i"m not a nitty type, so kuzla"s range would maybe be wider than normal... the only time i"d contemplate a fold in this spot/buy in was if for whatever reason i"d hardly opened any hands and my hud stats were showing that i hardly ever folded to a 3bet and my opening raise % from this position was really low like 4 or 5% and i thought that bapsilva had some idea that he knows that kuzla knows that... [if u know what i mean
]
1/I believed I was in bad shape against one of them
2/ I have a decent enough stack and a good feel for this table, that I believe I can pick up chips elsewhere
just on this part Grant, u had the 3 bigger stacks on your right, although not overly blessed with chips [or yourself] were they really playing that bad that u thought u"d get plenty of situations to get chips without a showdown? add in the shorter stacks to your left, in what ways did u think u could pick up chips?
with the shorter stacks all to your left when u opened did u have an idea pre-flop of who"d u call and what ranges u thought they might shove or re-raise on u? did u forget to factor in what u"d do if one jammed and some1 cold called the 3bet?..
would any1 ever think about limping in Grants situation?
a good read from Daryl Jace -
http://www.tournamentpokeredge.com/analyzing-your-game-are-you-outplaying-the-table/YOU SUCK, I SUCK, WE ALL SUCK!
reminds me of a similar thing Galfond/Gigabet did on striving to have no bias/set thoughts in your thinking...