Don"t you think the sample size is a bit small to give too much weighting to the stats?
I think the chance of being ahead on this hand is too low to call and would reluctantly fold - but I hope it was called because I want to see what the SB actually had 
i"m only accounting for above above avg aggro nature Jon , plus no reads as such from Rodders [tbf having seen 18 hands -
Hands: 60 | | VP$IP 30% | PFR: 28% | 3-Bet 10% | Fold to Steal: 75%
i"d thought Rodders would of had some sort of insight into the villains betting lines, quite handy to note in a large player pool where players won"t expect anyone to be noticing that their plays are standardised in a lot of spots [when in ZOOM/RUSH]
ref the the sample size - only 60 hands BUT remember this is based on a avg player pool of 400+ at most times of the day] , so 60 separate random occasions NOT 60 straight hands compounded by the fact that players can immediately go to a new hand by folding..
I think the chance of being ahead on this hand is too low to call and would reluctantly fold - but I hope it was called because I want to see what the SB actually had
i agree villains line is strong but given the lack of reads, the turn bet sizing and to a certain extent his check raise flop sizing i"d suspect villain to VB a wee bit bigger, making this a call..
