Author Topic: NO SNOW - 2 a.m. finishes ... Structure!?  (Read 15787 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

AMRN

  • Staker Licensed Player
  • Platinum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5261
Re: NO SNOW - 2 a.m. finishes ... Structure!?
« Reply #30 on: February 10, 2009, 09:45:40 AM »

I have not read ANY of the posts below so i am sorry if i may have repeated anything from anybody.

The main reason for the late finishing time was basically the amount of people down to the last 30-40 not being able to play a short stack.  There were no risks taken which should have been taken and no one grabbed the game by the balls one bit.  If someone decided to do that the game would have been over ALOT quicker.

I am not ****ting on anyones play but it really was like watching paint dry the amount of SUPER "tight" play near the end.

However i personally put this down to the standard of tournament poker at the moment. 


Interesting post. Out of interest, how far did you get?

WarBwastardo

  • Gold Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 601
  • I don't have to show you any stinkin' badges
    • La boca de la cueva
Re: NO SNOW - 2 a.m. finishes ... Structure!?
« Reply #31 on: February 10, 2009, 09:51:44 AM »


... it seems like a crazy time to be finishing on a Sunday night ...

Structure to be tweaked ... if there are 200 runners needs more of a twist I think.

I would be keen to kick antes in quicker ... only way to induce early action with "rocks" getting eaten away.

Various other threads have eluded to the fact this was a one off ... but it looked like a late late finish from very early on.

It must have affected some players needing to get home etc ...

I look forward to thoughts.

Louis


I have not read ANY of the posts below so i am sorry if i may have repeated anything from anybody.

The main reason for the late finishing time was basically the amount of people down to the last 30-40 not being able to play a short stack.  There were no risks taken which should have been taken and no one grabbed the game by the balls one bit.  If someone decided to do that the game would have been over ALOT quicker.

I am not ****ting on anyones play but it really was like watching paint dry the amount of SUPER "tight" play near the end.

However i personally put this down to the standard of tournament poker at the moment. 


You are actually ****ting on people"s play aren"t you.  That"s the whole point of your post. Fair enough, but it is an amateur game isn"t it..so it"s not unreasonable for people to either not necessarily know how to play a short stack or to decide to let their chips bleed away just so they could stay in the tournament for as long as possible and make the experience last.  Perhaps they weren"t having the enjoyment of railers as their priority.

« Last Edit: February 10, 2009, 09:53:17 AM by WarBwastard »

WASP

  • Silver Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 294
Re: NO SNOW - 2 a.m. finishes ... Structure!?
« Reply #32 on: February 10, 2009, 10:19:50 AM »


... it seems like a crazy time to be finishing on a Sunday night ...

Structure to be tweaked ... if there are 200 runners needs more of a twist I think.

I would be keen to kick antes in quicker ... only way to induce early action with "rocks" getting eaten away.

Various other threads have eluded to the fact this was a one off ... but it looked like a late late finish from very early on.

It must have affected some players needing to get home etc ...

I look forward to thoughts.

Louis


I have not read ANY of the posts below so i am sorry if i may have repeated anything from anybody.

The main reason for the late finishing time was basically the amount of people down to the last 30-40 not being able to play a short stack.  There were no risks taken which should have been taken and no one grabbed the game by the balls one bit.  If someone decided to do that the game would have been over ALOT quicker.

I am not ****ting on anyones play but it really was like watching paint dry the amount of SUPER "tight" play near the end.

However i personally put this down to the standard of tournament poker at the moment. 


Like your opinion counts for anything  ::)

The way you have behaved on countless forums over the years I don"t think New Zealand is far enough for you.

Bye!
Rear of the year 1991
Pipe smoker of the year 1998

treydj

  • Silver Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 159
  • flop, turn, river,cry,bed
Re: NO SNOW - 2 a.m. finishes ... Structure!?
« Reply #33 on: February 10, 2009, 11:21:12 AM »

.


One other thing to take a look at is the sizing of the antes. In some levels the ratio of ante to small blind was 10:1.... I think the highest I saw it was 6:1.  If the antes were just slightly larger and running between 4:1 and 6:1, the pots would have been more attractive for stealing, and would have induced more play (and stopped all that silly passive folding when down to the lasst three :) )



+1 - i agree antes need to be pitched according to SB and BB levels - one minute they are attractive and induce play, the next not worth it. a consistent 4:1 or 5:1 seems about right
Scottish APAT Champion 2008
APAT Pro-Am 2008 - Bronze
APAT North European Online 2010 - Silver
APAT UK Online Championship 2011 - Bronze

gatso

  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10
Re: NO SNOW - 2 a.m. finishes ... Structure!?
« Reply #34 on: February 10, 2009, 19:58:09 PM »
structure was superb and only needs a little tweaking to give a sensible finish time. this should do it imo

- increase antes on levels 7, 9, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16 and 18. the others are spot on
- extra level at end of saturday, ideally 2
- do not break any tables until field is at 171. then go to 9 handed tables. this will make for a better game as well as getting in more orbits speeding up the tourney

combine these with not having a huge break pre final table and the structure should work really well

the split dinner break will also make a contribution though not a great one. having 2x45 minutes staggered as opposed to 1x60minutes only saves 15 minutes overall

Honeybadg

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 3367
Re: NO SNOW - 2 a.m. finishes ... Structure!?
« Reply #35 on: February 10, 2009, 20:13:21 PM »
... liking this structure ...

L

Honeybadg

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 3367
Re: NO SNOW - 2 a.m. finishes ... Structure!?
« Reply #36 on: February 10, 2009, 20:29:43 PM »
... it"s always "nearly time for the clock" ...

L

Ripple11

  • Bronze Member
  • **
  • Posts: 68
Re: NO SNOW - 2 a.m. finishes ... Structure!?
« Reply #37 on: February 10, 2009, 20:31:21 PM »



Quote

 44.  Calling for the clock procedures: Once a reasonable amount of time has passed and a clock is called for, a player will be given one minute to make a decision.  If action has not been taken by the time the minute is over, there will be a ten second countdown.  If a player has not acted on his hand by the time the countdown is over, the hand will be dead.  The following individuals, without exception, are entitled to call a clock on a player;-

        1. Tournament Director.
        2. Table Dealer.
        3. Another player participating in that specific hand.

For the avoidance of doubt, the clock cannot be called on a player by another player who is not participating in the hand in question.




Early on in the tournament there was a hand on my table between a couple of players that took forever indeed one player contemplating for just under 5 minutes before raising all in and the other taking a full 5 to make his decision.

although out of the hand both myself and Foggy contemplated asking for the clock.  We both held stum for my part simply because I had taken a few minutes to decide to fold to an all in bet on the turn knowing I had 12 outs almost certainly 15 and possibly 18 only 10 minutes earlier.  The Gambler in me desperately wanted to gamble and run up to nearly 40k if i hit but crippled if missed halfway through level 2 but I chickened out.

Had either of us called the clock I see we would have been in breach of APAT rules which would have been unfortunate.

I think this rule needs to be looked at.  For the record the 2 players involved were  not trying to time waste but feedback does seem to suggest there was a hell of lot of timewasting later when the blinds got serious.

Surely if you are in the tournament the timewasting does affect you whether in the hand or not.
[/quote]

Exactly..........but as Tighty says a lot of dealers feel intimidated to call the clock.

Solutions?.well I"ve seen a player (not in the hand) ask the dealer if its "nearly" time to call the clock?!

FirePhil

  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5
Re: NO SNOW - 2 a.m. finishes ... Structure!?
« Reply #38 on: February 10, 2009, 21:59:44 PM »

structure was superb and only needs a little tweaking to give a sensible finish time. this should do it imo

- increase antes on levels 7, 9, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16 and 18. the others are spot on
- extra level at end of saturday, ideally 2
- do not break any tables until field is at 171. then go to 9 handed tables. this will make for a better game as well as getting in more orbits speeding up the tourney

combine these with not having a huge break pre final table and the structure should work really well

the split dinner break will also make a contribution though not a great one. having 2x45 minutes staggered as opposed to 1x60minutes only saves 15 minutes overall

That sounds bang on.

I think this tournament was just a bit anomalous, the super tight play after the bubble was a bit odd to see especially given the flat payout structure up until top 3. Probably just a bit of nerves and tiredness after two long days I guess.

waltypies

  • Bronze Member
  • **
  • Posts: 72
Re: NO SNOW - 2 a.m. finishes ... Structure!?
« Reply #39 on: February 11, 2009, 04:01:10 AM »



... it seems like a crazy time to be finishing on a Sunday night ...

Structure to be tweaked ... if there are 200 runners needs more of a twist I think.

I would be keen to kick antes in quicker ... only way to induce early action with "rocks" getting eaten away.

Various other threads have eluded to the fact this was a one off ... but it looked like a late late finish from very early on.

It must have affected some players needing to get home etc ...

I look forward to thoughts.

Louis


I have not read ANY of the posts below so i am sorry if i may have repeated anything from anybody.

The main reason for the late finishing time was basically the amount of people down to the last 30-40 not being able to play a short stack.  There were no risks taken which should have been taken and no one grabbed the game by the balls one bit.  If someone decided to do that the game would have been over ALOT quicker.

I am not ****ting on anyones play but it really was like watching paint dry the amount of SUPER "tight" play near the end.

However i personally put this down to the standard of tournament poker at the moment. 


Like your opinion counts for anything  ::)

The way you have behaved on countless forums over the years I don"t think New Zealand is far enough for you.

Bye!


Ermmmmm thats a bit harsh?  

a) I have no idea who you are (might be a good thing)
b) You dont know me
c) Countless forums?  I seem to recall only having 4 memberships (APAT, Bristol meetup, gambling.co.uk and blonde (very rarely post))
d) Most jokes i make are very tongue in cheek and it does take a bit of intelligence to understand them.

Like i said before i was not putting down anyones play but if they want to play like that its fine.  But dont expect the game to be over in time if thats the case.

So please stay under your rock ;)

Fatcatstu

  • Staker Licensed Player
  • Platinum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2648
Re: NO SNOW - 2 a.m. finishes ... Structure!?
« Reply #40 on: February 11, 2009, 18:20:58 PM »
I think i am probably who the "Clock" argument is aimed at. I took a while on 2 decisions, one with 55 and one with 77. I was trying to use my absolutely exhausted brain to figure out if i fancied putting my tournament life on the line with them hands.

I appologised at the time for both of them, but it was a pretty major decision considering i was short stacked at the table!

I think the way that one or 2 people were trying to get the clock called was borderline intimidation to be honest, and was not really that helpful.

Just my thoughts.
England C Captain 2012
World Team Champions England 2013