In my opinion it hard to call it the "English Championship" unless a structure exists that allows everyone to qualify - and we have the regionals/onliners to do just that...
We also have the clickfest method - there is absolutely no practical reason why anybody couldn"t get a seat using this method.
... However I"d like APAT to eliminate all the £75 direct buy-in lottery and increase the number of qualifying places in the regionals...
It isn"t easy for me to get to the nearest regional casinos to me - it is highly likely that anytime I get deep in one I will be on the streets until the next morning waiting for the first train home, but I can at least make it.
What about the people who - absolutely can"t make it to the regional tournaments?
Would you suggest that they are just excluded from APAt National Championships because of this? And similarly, live and online can be very different - would you exclude those people who don"t like playing online from them - because that could be the practical effect of increasing the number of qualifiers through online satellites.
...I wouldt give the £75 cash or ticket option....
So you would effectively want to turn the Regional Championships into a series of satellites? As alluded to in an earlier post this would utterly destroy the credibility of the results as so many people would stop trying once their seat was secure.
What would you really prefer - a number of satellites, or a genuine Regional Championship?
I personally would wait to see the cumulative effect over the whole season before jumping to conclusions, but my intuition suggests to me that the other way would be more effective. If the Regional Championships did not provide a seat (other than the big prize at the end for the Champion), ie if they were not a satellite at all, this would reduce demand for the Regionals (which I think will come in very handy when they start filling up). And it would increase the supply of seats for the clickfest - making it less manic and give a larger margin for success for the number of people who are committed to entering the National Championships.
I would reiterate that this is my first impression, and at the end of the season I will be perfectly happy to concede that I was wrong if the evidence suggests otherwise. I don"t think that there is anything spectacularly wrong with how it is now, I would expect there to be a few tweaks to improve the format next season but that we will only be able to get a good idea of what they have to be when we get the full dataset of results for how Season 2 has panned out.
So my ultimate conclusion is: why don"t we wait and see?
(for a little bit at least)