Omaha hi lo cash hand - is this right?

[LongshanksED]

***** Hand 2317273545 *****
0.05/0.10 Omaha Hi/Lo (PL) - 04 September 2010 21:10:44
Table OH 861 (Real /Cash Game )
Seat 1: OtsoPuh (11.19)
Seat 2: ShanksyED (9.74)
Seat 3: didobg1 (12.37)
Seat 4: bacanuxo1 (4.00)
Seat 5: sQr* (48.29)
didobg1 post SB 0.05
bacanuxo1 post BB 0.10
** Deal **
OtsoPuh [N/A, N/A, N/A, N/A]
ShanksyED [, As, , ]
didobg1 [N/A, N/A, N/A, N/A]
bacanuxo1 [N/A, N/A, N/A, N/A]
sQr* [N/A, N/A, N/A, N/A]
*** Bet Round 1 ***
sQr* Fold
OtsoPuh Call 0.10
ShanksyED Raise to 0.45
didobg1 Fold
bacanuxo1 Fold
OtsoPuh Call 0.45
*** Flop(Board): *** : [, , ]
*** Bet Round 2 ***
OtsoPuh Check
ShanksyED Bet 0.78
OtsoPuh Call 0.78
*** Turn(Board): *** : [, , , ]
*** Bet Round 3 ***
OtsoPuh Check
ShanksyED Check
*** River(Board): *** : [, , , , ]
*** Bet Round 4 ***
OtsoPuh Bet 1.30
ShanksyED Call 1.30
*** Showdown *** : Rake: 0.26 Total Pot: 4.95
OtsoPuh [, , , ] Straight to the seven 6,5,4,3,A Win: 4.95
ShanksyED Fold Win: 0.00
didobg1 Fold Win: 0.00
bacanuxo1 Fold Win: 0.00



now i lose the hi half to the straight - thats ok

lo half villian shows A3456
but i have A2 347 - A2 being in my hand and 347 on the board

shouldnt i be awarded the lo half?

[AMRN]

why? he has the lower hand..... 6 lo is lower than 7 lo

[duke3016]

why? he has the lower hand..... 6 lo is lower than 7 lo

I think Steve is right here - bloody hell Steve right

[LongshanksED]

ahhhhh?

that would make sense then - im still attempting split games and see it now

cheers

[AMRN]

ahhhhh?

that would make sense then - im still attempting split games and see it now

cheers

A2345 is the lo nuts. A2346 is second nuts, A2356 is third nuts...... etc   45678 is worst lo hand

hope that helps

[Cyntaf]

a simple way to work it out is to reverse the 5 cards ie 54,321 as a number and the lowest number wins as in your example
76,xxx is a larger number than 6x,xxx therefore the 76 loses. Hope this helps for future hands your involved in?

A lot of players, myself included, begin/began working from the Ace up, could cost a lot of money playing this way

A better example would be :  76432 would beat 76521(A) as you can see the first number can be subtracted from the second, leaving a positive number. also reads easier this way,7"s=, 6"s= then the 4 in the hundreds unit is obviously lower than the 5.

Cheers Paul