Whats people"s opinions on the average stack amount?
lots of common sense in this thread that i don"t need to repeat but to add abit about average stacks...
if you"re on average stack in a tourney you"ll have more chips than the majority of players left in the tourney and you"re usually in not too bad shape relative to the blinds.
I should add that I do pay more attention to the blinds/antes than the average stack as obviously it only changes when someone gets knocked out so won"t neccessarily change on a hand by hand basis.
If there was 100 left and you had exactly average, you"d probably be in the range of 36th to 43rd in chips (rough figures). You also find the top 10-12 have big stacks and 1, 2 or sometimes 3 will have a humungous amount of chips.
You need to play a different game with a big stack and as laz says, you should expect huge swings in your stack size during earlier phases of the tourney as that"s the way you would need to be playing to get a huge stack in the first place, even changing gears doesn"t always seem to help. Gambling basically and although i love poker, i hate gambling :-) go figure... The big stacks do seem to bomb out quite often, even my home game the 2 big stacks at the break were first out last time...never even made the final table...needs a different game with a gearbox and clutch and stuff and a lot don"t seem to manage it.
So in summary, i"m not too bothered about gaining a huge stack (though I am always trying to gain chips lol) but do pay attention to M (blinds in relation to my stack) and average stacks etc.
A big stack won"t guarantee you winning the tourney but should get you a good few levels higher up the pay structure if you get it at the right time and then use it sensibly.
Don"t get me wrong though, if i end up with a big stack i"m not usually too upset about it