APAT Cash Game ...

[ladman]

do a big game style vote

[KarmaDope]

How about the following ... (off the top of my head)

At some future event we start with one (or more) cash table(s) ... stakes to be decided ... (max re-buys to be decided)

The cash table could be open to all - if too many players then starting players by lots.

(Or have some qualifying events on 888?)

Players can leave if they want at any time, but otherwise players are periodically introduced from a waiting list.

Table review every say 60 mins, with the two players who have lost the most in the previous session replaced (though they can rejoin the waiting list).

Players are rated by net profit ...

Thoughts?

L

Disagree - not fair if ppl suffer a bad beat then cant try and win it back.

[Marty719]

How about the following ... (off the top of my head)

At some future event we start with one (or more) cash table(s) ... stakes to be decided ... (max re-buys to be decided)

The cash table could be open to all - if too many players then starting players by lots.

(Or have some qualifying events on 888?)

Players can leave if they want at any time, but otherwise players are periodically introduced from a waiting list.

Table review every say 60 mins, with the two players who have lost the most in the previous session replaced (though they can rejoin the waiting list).

Players are rated by net profit ...

Thoughts?

L

Rated by profit is a def, but would be v unfair to make players who are losing leave the table.  I dnt think there would be massive demand for a space at the table.  If we got 15 players then could start with 9 and have people to sit in when people naturally want to stop/take a break.  Could be great entertainment tho!!

[Honeybadg]

... could rotate people by lots too ... I would have thought there would be great demand as people were ejected from the MTT ... could be wrong ...

Could rotate off the people that play the least hands!

L

[Marty719]

... could rotate people by lots too ... I would have thought there would be great demand as people were ejected from the MTT ... could be wrong ...

Could rotate off the people that play the least hands!

L

Im fully behin the idea of the cash game, but dnt think that rotating players like this is great.  It would suck to be forced to leave the table after being card dead for an hour (30 hands).  Live poker is slow.  It could be run as a normal game with a starting table and a waiting list.  People will naturally bust out and have breaks.

[AMRN]

Rotation every hour by player vote. Each player at the table submits a private vote, and the person with the most votes has to leave.

[Foggy]

Rotation every hour by player vote. Each player at the table submits a private vote, and the person with the most votes has to leave.

i.e get rid of the sharks, and leave the fish............you can stay Steve

[Honeybadg]

... could rotate people by lots too ... I would have thought there would be great demand as people were ejected from the MTT ... could be wrong ...

Could rotate off the people that play the least hands!

L

Im fully behin the idea of the cash game, but dnt think that rotating players like this is great.  It would suck to be forced to leave the table after being card dead for an hour (30 hands).  Live poker is slow.  It could be run as a normal game with a starting table and a waiting list.  People will naturally bust out and have breaks.

I would expect at least 15 playable hands from the 30 ...  

[Marty719]

Obv min buy in 100x...

[deanp27]

Obv min buy in 100x...

was just about to say no shortdonkers

also not keen on being forced to leave a cash game by voting or whatever other means, should be optional for the player

[Swinebag]

I think this will run fine without eliminating players or voting off. Would set a minimum of 100xBB but cap at 200xBB

[Paulie_D]

I think this will run fine without eliminating players or voting off. Would set a minimum of 100xBB but cap at 200xBB

OK, I have no interest in this personally but if this is supposed to be some sort of objective competition then it would only make sense that everyone start with the same amount.

100BB seems logical.

[Marty719]

I think this will run fine without eliminating players or voting off. Would set a minimum of 100xBB but cap at 200xBB

OK, I have no interest in this personally but if this is supposed to be some sort of objective competition then it would only make sense that everyone start with the same amount.

100BB seems logical.

It"s cash.  Doesn"t have to be the same amount imo, just within parameters, ie 100-200x.  People can top up any time they want so restrictions shouldnt be made on buy-ins.  

[deanp27]

Gets more interesting >100bb deep especially if straddled etc.

[AMRN]

I think this will run fine without eliminating players or voting off. Would set a minimum of 100xBB but cap at 200xBB

but then you are only opening the game to first come first served who could potentially sit until the table closes and never leave - I would have thought that if making the game available to all, you would need to ensure some sort of player rotation.