I have heard a lot of players on about value for money in tourneys, such as overlays, guarantees and other stuff.
How many players play for the money or the enjoyment of the game.
There is one casino that I visit, small buy in £15 f/o, nice friendly game averages around 45/50 runners.
Me and mrs mac get there as often as we can, now we say this is value for money.
£15 + £1.50 for an average of 4 hours enjoyment, what could you get for that anywhere else ?
and still with a chance of walking away with £250 +.
We all look at value for money differently, that"s what I call value for money, yet a few players that play at mine say they would never play that tourney.
So do I play to win money are for the fun of it ?.
To be honest it is probably for the fun of it, although when at the tables I play to win it"s the challenge itself.
I would gladly sit down and play a 0.50p tourney.
In my games there are players from all walks of life, we have a people in good jobs and some out of work so our buy in has to suit all, to be honest most of the ones that have the good jobs are not interested in how small the buy in is, they just want to play.
After our tourney or when there is a table empty there is a cash game, this will probably shock you all but it is a max £5 sit down with the blinds 10p and 10p.
I have this set low not only to cater for everyone but all players that come to play are my friends and I do not want to see them lose a fortune, if this happened it could even end up spoiling the game.
Just my thoughts.
So is it money ?, enjoyment of the game ?, or both ?.