0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: ForthThistle on October 14, 2011, 21:32:21 PMthe ruling is....Aaron"s all in stands, but action is refered back to Jane who has the same two options, bet or check.If She checks, Aaron is committed to the all in, if she bets, aaron can take his all in back and has the complete option once again.So the ruling you gave is actually wrong, sorry to say, and once Jane has said call, that stands and she is now committed to call the out of turn bet.Even this isn"t necessarily correct, although I believe it should be.The correct answer is to refer to the rules of the cardroom as to what to do next as they are all different. After a similar incident at Coventry Goliath this year I"ve totally given up the idea of knowing what is right and wrong in this or any other scenario.Of course you won"t have any cardroom rules. But lets face it, out of turn or not, Aaron went all in and Jane called. The cards went on their backs and nobody but the dealer complained. The dealer should be sacked, one of the most ridiculous rulings I"ve ever heard/read.
the ruling is....Aaron"s all in stands, but action is refered back to Jane who has the same two options, bet or check.If She checks, Aaron is committed to the all in, if she bets, aaron can take his all in back and has the complete option once again.So the ruling you gave is actually wrong, sorry to say, and once Jane has said call, that stands and she is now committed to call the out of turn bet.
