Tournament in Gunwharf Grosvenor last night.
£20 + 2 optional rebuys/add-ons.
5000 chips starting - same for rebuy/add-on.
54 runners.
Chips in play 675k.
7 paid. Prizes 1.£850, 2.£620, 3.£410, 4.£290
4 left - stacks approx:
UTG 275k
Button (me) 250k
SB 120k
BB 30k
6,000/12,000/500
UTG raises to 35k.
I have 99. Good spot to reraise prob but, against the other big stack, I decide to flat-call with position and see what the flop brings.
SB folds.
BB calls and is all-in.
Main pot 114k.
Side pot 10k.
Flop 89T - two spades.
UTG checks.
Obv I would almost always bet here, though short-handed the chances of being outdrawn are less. UTG may have a hand to pay off plenty or he might just fold if I bet. If he calls, I may lose or win a lot of chips by the end.
I"m not a fan of checking down, but in this scenario it has merits. If the BB has draws, he will get to see whether they come in no matter what I do, so I might lose the main pot anyway. I am almost certainly ahead now, though don"t fancy being check-raised here, esp by a drawing hand that isn"t going to fold and might get there by the end. So checking back would be more for pot control than to eliminate the small stack.
Bet or check? If I bet, it is difficult to find an amount that would put UTG off possible draws without playing for stacks, so I could just shove and hope he doesn"t have QJ.
Betting is the obvious play, but is there any merit in checking behind here?