Never thought about it until now, but feel that it might make more sense to have the cheaper one first.... might get more runners, then perhaps some of those come back on the following nights to play again. As it stands, people may still go for the cheaper one, and swerve the expensive ones.... but if they miss out in the cheaper one, they have no further opportunity.
yip, that"s my point, would get more runners and more of them would be likely to play at least the next most expensive sat...well, i would be...and if i""ve played 2 i"d probably play the third just to try and save something on the entry...being scottish and therefore inherently miserable, avoiding the expensive ones unless i have to play them is the default mode :-)
seriously though, makes no sense to me why you"d have the dear one first, there must be some kind of logic to it but i don"t understand it....
Not that it matters but i"m fairly sure this isn"t the way it"s always been...
