Author Topic: Match Structure  (Read 95435 times)

0 Members and 17 Guests are viewing this topic.

CincinnatiKid

  • Regional Captain
  • Platinum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1108
Re: Match 2 Structure
« Reply #150 on: March 19, 2012, 12:53:26 PM »

This is a $11 weekly tournament, for it to go on till 3am is a no go for me and I would assume also for a lot of people who have to work on Monday morning. Also support on the rail is important within the team aspect of the game.

The current structure is perfect for a reasonable amount of play and to finish at a reasonable time


+1
Follow my Poker Twitter @CINK1D
Follow my Horseracing Twitter @AG_CGN
Ex Team Lucky Squad
Captain Ex-Regional Team Europe
Member Ex-Regional Team East of England
Member Ex-Luton Poker Club

WYoung83

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1049
Re: Match 2 Structure
« Reply #151 on: March 19, 2012, 13:25:22 PM »
 Doubt that i will be commited to playing all 15 legs if it remains the same as last night, i understand its better than a reg mtt that stars throw out, but u can fire up and grind 100s of these a week and reduce the flip variance etc, so i dont know why people are comparing the structures because its a different animal.  This is a league where we want to gain points over 15 weeks. And in reg mtts we play for ourselves and dont have to worry about busting a team mate. maybe others think the same maybe they dont.


George2Loose

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1668
Re: Match 2 Structure
« Reply #152 on: March 19, 2012, 13:51:38 PM »
Just adjust to the structure. Thats what good players do whether its 100k stack and a 2 hour clock or a 1k stack with a 3 min clock
Follow me on twitter:  gb2loose

AMRN

  • Staker Licensed Player
  • Platinum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5261
Re: Match 2 Structure
« Reply #153 on: March 19, 2012, 13:53:30 PM »

Just adjust to the structure. Thats what good players do whether its 100k stack and a 2 hour clock or a 1k stack with a 3 min clock


OMG I agree with George - scary!!

TheSnapper

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1061
Re: Match 2 Structure
« Reply #154 on: March 19, 2012, 13:56:35 PM »


There has got to be a balance here, and the best APAT can do is find a balance that ticks as many boxes for as many members as possible.  Clearly a difficult task, but achievable.   ;D


Point well made and highlights the dilemma, "how to continue to keep em all happy"
"Being wrong is erroneously associated with failure, when, in fact, to be proven wrong should be celebrated, for it elevates someone to a new level of understanding."

BOINGBLITZ

  • Regional Captain
  • Platinum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1513
Re: Match 2 Structure
« Reply #155 on: March 19, 2012, 14:18:04 PM »
If this structure stays then week one and all the points scored should be wiped out and the game replayed......how can you move the goalposts after the game has started?
LATVIAN O/L CHAMPION 2008.
WELSH O/L CHAMPION 2009
IRISH AMATEUR CHAMPION 2009, in memory of Bill Young
WELSH O/L PLO CHAMPION 2013
Bronze medalist 2009 & Captain 2010 ENGLAND team.
CAPTAIN 4-TIME O/L CHAMPS WALSALL / WEST MIDLANDS.
No.1 ranked Online 2009.
R-up Sth Euro O/L PLO 2010
3rd Pu

Jon MW

  • Global Moderator
  • Platinum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2138
Re: Match 2 Structure
« Reply #156 on: March 19, 2012, 14:20:45 PM »


Just adjust to the structure. Thats what good players do whether its 100k stack and a 2 hour clock or a 1k stack with a 3 min clock


OMG I agree with George - scary!!


Adjust to the structure is a self evident truism.

But I don"t see how it"s relevant to how good or bad the structure is.

If it has to stay like this then people just have to decide whether it"s worth playing or not - simple as.
Jon "the British cowboy" Woodfield
2011 UK Team Championships: Black Belt Poker Team Captain  - - runners up - -
5 Star HORSE Classic - Razz 2007 Champion
2007 WSOP Razz 13/341

ronaldo07

  • Silver Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 252
Re: Match 2 Structure
« Reply #157 on: March 19, 2012, 14:24:24 PM »

Just adjust to the structure. Thats what good players do whether its 100k stack and a 2 hour clock or a 1k stack with a 3 min clock


Exactly this.
Team GNF member Bronze medal S4
Team GNF member GOLD S5

George2Loose

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1668
Re: Match 2 Structure
« Reply #158 on: March 19, 2012, 14:27:37 PM »

If this structure stays then week one and all the points scored should be wiped out and the game replayed......how can you move the goalposts after the game has started?


Lol so if a rd decides to play 9 levels instead of 8 in a live comp it should be cancelled and restarted?
Follow me on twitter:  gb2loose

George2Loose

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1668
Re: Match 2 Structure
« Reply #159 on: March 19, 2012, 14:30:45 PM »



Just adjust to the structure. Thats what good players do whether its 100k stack and a 2 hour clock or a 1k stack with a 3 min clock


OMG I agree with George - scary!!


Adjust to the structure is a self evident truism.

But I don"t see how it"s relevant to how good or bad the structure is.

If it has to stay like this then people just have to decide whether it"s worth playing or not - simple as.


Think we would lose more players with a 4am finish every week
Follow me on twitter:  gb2loose

deanp27

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1459
Re: Match 2 Structure
« Reply #160 on: March 19, 2012, 15:55:57 PM »

If this structure stays then week one and all the points scored should be wiped out and the game replayed......how can you move the goalposts after the game has started?


Not sure if serious
Looking forward to making my first day 2

Chipaccrual

  • Administrator
  • Platinum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11339
    • APAT
Re: Match 2 Structure
« Reply #161 on: March 19, 2012, 16:04:26 PM »


If this structure stays then week one and all the points scored should be wiped out and the game replayed......how can you move the goalposts after the game has started?


Not sure if serious


Not serious.  He"d have typed it in capitals if he was serious.   ;)

BOINGBLITZ

  • Regional Captain
  • Platinum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1513
Re: Match 2 Structure
« Reply #162 on: March 19, 2012, 16:41:53 PM »
LOL LEIGH.....my point is that we were told at the start what was happening, costs,structure, points, etc.....then one week in it is changed.
 If the week one set up wasn"t different to week 2, then why was it changed?
 If it (obviously) was different, then the week one game should not count IMO as it was played under a different set of rules.
 Match one of Cricket"s World Cup is over 50 overs but the West Indies need to be up early in week 2 so it is changed to a 20-over comp from then on in. Are those two games the same??...of course not, and neither is this.
 If you set up a League you should stick to the rules you made at the start. If people didn"t like them then why did they sign up to play?
 The only way you should change them is with TOTAL agreement to do so.

IMO.

And the set up as it stands is rubbish. End Of.
LATVIAN O/L CHAMPION 2008.
WELSH O/L CHAMPION 2009
IRISH AMATEUR CHAMPION 2009, in memory of Bill Young
WELSH O/L PLO CHAMPION 2013
Bronze medalist 2009 & Captain 2010 ENGLAND team.
CAPTAIN 4-TIME O/L CHAMPS WALSALL / WEST MIDLANDS.
No.1 ranked Online 2009.
R-up Sth Euro O/L PLO 2010
3rd Pu

Paulie_D

  • Administrator
  • Platinum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6420
  • Travel Guru
Re: Match 2 Structure
« Reply #163 on: March 19, 2012, 16:48:33 PM »
“Thor has Mjolnir but I have a banhammer. I think I win”

TheSnapper

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1061
Re: Match 2 Structure
« Reply #164 on: March 19, 2012, 17:27:43 PM »
This thread reminded me of This
"Being wrong is erroneously associated with failure, when, in fact, to be proven wrong should be celebrated, for it elevates someone to a new level of understanding."