Feedback on National Online Cup structure.

[Matt D]

A few people have mentioned they have this problem. It"s caused by the moveable "info" boxes being positioned in the way by default. One "fix" is to move seat, but this will mean you won"t be able to see your opponents cards in seat 1, which therefore isn"t a great solution.

Matt.. don"t be forgetting its only you with your special admin login that can see everyones cards  

lol

I should have phrased that better I meant at showdown / all-ins

[Matt D]

What does everyone think of the structure change?

2.5k > 3.5k chips, and an extra 2 levels (though one of which you probably won"t see):

150/300/25 and 1250/2500/250.

[ajcairns]

err I didnt see either of those new levels...

Watched the rest of the team though and it seemed much better.

[AMRN]

What does everyone think of the structure change?

2.5k > 3.5k chips, and an extra 2 levels (though one of which you probably won"t see):

150/300/25 and 1250/2500/250.

Revised structure is excellent!

[Matt D]

3.5k chips I mean (not 3k as previously posted - have edited my post and AMRN"s to fix that).

ty for feedback Yeah, I think it"s much better too. A kind of structure I"d like to play. Maybe Des will allow an APAT Staff team next time round? (hint)

[PHIL_TC]

What does everyone think of the structure change?

2.5k > 3.5k chips, and an extra 2 levels (though one of which you probably won"t see):

150/300/25 and 1250/2500/250.

Revised structure is excellent!

Yup +1 spot on

[Scousebill]

I enjoyed the new set up. Could of tinkered with the suck-outs though... My AA beaten by AK hits a straight.. Pity it wasn"t this way from game one..  

[Matt D]

I enjoyed the new set up. Could of tinkered with the suck-outs though... My AA beaten by AK hits a straight.. Pity it wasn"t this way from game one..  

Thanks.

It"s very much a learning process when setting up new formats for the first time. Now we"ve arrived at a structure most seem happy with, we"ll be using this again for Season 2 of the National Online Cup (to be announced ).

[nosey-p]

I enjoyed the new set up. Could of tinkered with the suck-outs though... My AA beaten by AK hits a straight.. Pity it wasn"t this way from game one..  

Thanks.

It"s very much a learning process when setting up new formats for the first time. Now we"ve arrived at a structure most seem happy with, we"ll be using this again for Season 2 of the National Online Cup (to be announced ).

You are supposed to say Season 2 of the National Cup coming soon

The rules may have to be looked at like teams of 4 top 3 scoring

[fandango]

I have enjoyed playing in this, I think the structure is spot on now.. There is always room for improvement and I"m sure we all have ideas regarding points etc.. My only idea which I think could improve it from my point of view is that all players have to pay the registration fees up front.
Then you might find that teams with players who have agreed to play actually commit too, teams who only had two or three players show up each game where " drawing thin" from the off.

Each player pays $$$ in a holding tank, then each tourney has a set payout for top 4 finishes.. Same happens for teams who make the final stage?

[Starshine]

I have enjoyed playing in this, I think the structure is spot on now.. There is always room for improvement and I"m sure we all have ideas regarding points etc.. My only idea which I think could improve it from my point of view is that all players have to pay the registration fees up front.
Then you might find that teams with players who have agreed to play actually commit too, teams who only had two or three players show up each game where " drawing thin" from the off.

Each player pays $$$ in a holding tank, then each tourney has a set payout for top 4 finishes.. Same happens for teams who make the final stage?

I agree there, good idea. Not that I can complain, as our team is always complete, but I do know very well how awful this can be, from the last apat thing on stars, it was not really motivating when more than half of the team was missing. So a solution for this would be great.

[Matt D]

Yes, I actually like the idea of top 4 from 6 players scoring points too, so that if a couple can"t make it one week it"s not Game Over.

Going to start with the points at 2.30pm-ish. Should take me 90 minutes or so, so hoping they"ll be up by 4pm

[scouse3465]

I enjoyed the new set up. Could of tinkered with the suck-outs though... My AA beaten by AK hits a straight.. Pity it wasn"t this way from game one..  

Try Dans sick beat he had 2 players all in who ended up finishing top 3 and prob cost us being threw with a game to go ! He had AA v KK v AK ace high flop only for runner runner giving both players straight with king ! So he out shortly after instead of busting 2 players who then went on to help both teams beat us !

[Matt D]

Scores taking a bit longer than anticipated.

Soooon!

[Starshine]

Scores taking a bit longer than anticipated.

Soooon!

do you need assistance? I have calculated the scores for our group yesterday evening