Board:
Dead:
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 74.434% 74.43% 00.00% 14738 0.00 { QQ-JJ, 77, 44, AcQc, AcTc, Ac9c, Ac7c, Tc9c, 9c8c, 6c5c }
Hand 1: 25.566% 25.57% 00.00% 5062 0.00 { AdJs }
Board:
[you are getting slightly less than 2/1 to call the turn shove]
Dead:
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 71.591% 71.59% 00.00% 630 0.00 { QQ-JJ, 77, 44, AcQc, AcTc, Ac9c, Ac7c, Tc9c, 9c8c, 6c5c }
Hand 1: 28.409% 28.41% 00.00% 250 0.00 { AdJs }
hopefully the above might get some to re-think, even if you add a % of air for villain then you have to also allow for villain flatting a 3bet in position with AA KK AKcc a certain % of the time also..
its a 3bet pot approx 165bb eff no reads, no history between the players, play against his whole range NOT what you hope he has, re-read G-Bucks would be a good starting point if you haven"t already..
in 3bet pot no reads what would villain be putting you on? agreed your line screams weak after you flat his re-raise and check the turn BUT when the situation you are in is flipping/way behind at best then bloody well FOLD the flop remember mostly the perceived 3bet strength of your hand is ahead of villains 3bet flat range on this board, if you fold every spot like this then at best you only end up losing a little bit of money, NOT winning the occasional and losing mostly, quite simply in grey spots like this you will be wrong far more than right..
rather than only just looking at the post flop decisions, consider the pre flop situation, 3betting oop AJo to a utg1/mp raiser in 6max, re-think your 3bet ranges, how much for value and what type of hands readless would be better to add to the weaker part...