It is unfortunate for those who are not successful, but I don"t think a draw is any fairer.
A draw is "fairer". It gives everyone who puts their name forward an equal chance to get in.
That has to be the "fairest" way.
BUT, it probably isn"t the best.
With a draw, no one is committed to playing 100%. It ends up having twice as many people putting their names forward, but many don"t actually take up their seat allocation when they are offered a place.
This means reserve lists.
The problem with that is that people who did want to play but didn"t get in via the draw are left in "limbo", not being able to organise their weekend until the last minute. This means more expensive hotels, having to mess other people around with commitments, etc.
It also means a hell of a lot more work for Des and the team, chasing people up for payment, then informing reserves that they have a seat and have 24 hours or whatever to take up that place. This means more hassle, more confusion, and it still doesn"t necessarily mean that those that really want to play get a seat.
I"ve got into two events via the reserve list after missing out on the main list via the draw. The first time I was 69th on the reserve list, the second time, I was in the teens (but I think it went down to beyond 40th place on the reserve list in the end). If I"d missed out on these events, it would be "fair", but completely out of my control. Saying that of course, I would have turned up early on the day and got myself on the reserve list anyway.
To improve the situation for this season, there are the regional events as well as the online sats. This enables a very large number of people to secure a place well before the clickfest and the associated panic, worry, relief/disappointment.
Until we have 500-seat card rooms (oh, we will soon
), then the events are going to be limited to around the 200 mark. Some people are going to be disappointed.
But see the rest of you in Walsall