Maybe we don"t agree on what value is, I mean in terms of ability to win the maximum and lose the minimum, there is value in doing both.
When villain raises utg+1 with a range that will look something like.....
22+,ATs+,KTs+,QTs+,JTs,T9s,AJo+,KQo, (possibly a little wide this early tbh.)
we 3 bet and he will continue (call or 4b ) oop with a range like...........
JJ+,AQs+,AKo,
Yes when he folds we win a small pot, when he 4 bets we fold and lose 450 (the minimum) cuz we "know where we are" but!
We have presented villain with the information to correctly fold.......
TT-22,AJs-ATs,KTs+,QTs+,JTs,T9s,AQo-AJo,KQo,
JJ has lots of equity against most of those hands so we don"t want them folding.
So, do we maximise our value?
Would you 3b TT in this spot?